I've skimmed the Gnutella specification, however, and nowhere does it say that the network is confined to pornography and MP3s, at least not until version 3.0. As you surely noted, it's exceptionally hard to defend Gnutella these days (indeed, since it's inception), when it mostly conveys files of dubious legality. This is true for most things found in this world of mine, however, so it should be of little consequence. These reasons, it should be noted, have nothing to do with Wikipedia per-se. We should probably untie the sysadmin first.
I'm ever vigilant against the day the Evil-Government-Agents-cum-Martians blow Wikipedia's servers to smithereens. Minuscule reduction in bandwidth costs and Censorship evasion (due to aversion). What are the justifications for enabling Gnutella access? Gnutella is more accessible, on the other hand, and this may even prove to be a good thing. Other than that, however, I would have great preferred a Freenet server. Justifications Why Gnutella? īecause pigeons won't do.
0 kommentar(er)
